ShareThis Page
Editorial: Penn Hills grand jury report, recovery plan short on teaching lessons |

Editorial: Penn Hills grand jury report, recovery plan short on teaching lessons

Penn Hills School District’s administration office

You can’t keep digging a hole without making plans to climb out.

Right now, it doesn’t seem like Penn Hills School District will ever find a way out of the dirt.

On Tuesday, a grand jury report used words like “economic ruin,” “egregious” and “catastrophic” to paint a picture of the $172 million pit of debt the district has dug through a combination of “wantonly” ignoring the advice of the state and its own staff and advisers, flagrant spending, and “inept” voting.

“The reckless financial decisions made by the Penn Hills school board, school administrators and their advisors over the past decade plunged the district into an accelerating downward financial spiral that has resulted in the district’s economic ruin,” the report said.

And yet, no one is going to face charges over anything. Much like the 2008 U.S. financial crisis where everyone could point to poor decisions and bad judgment and out-and-out failure, there won’t be much in the way of punishment.

The report amounts to a public scolding of a recalcitrant child by a parent who has no intention to give a timeout, much less a richly deserved move to military school. It is a loudly barking dog behind a sturdy fence. It draws attention, which the allegations of mismanagement and impropriety absolutely demand, but there is more personal consequence to a parking ticket.

The state Department of Education has done more, placing the district in “financial recovery,” a designation a step past the “financial watch” Penn Hills has been on for two years. Former Wilkinsburg Superintendent Daniel Matsook has been named the recovery officer and has been given the Herculean task of filling in the giant hole the district has dug for itself. Or at least preventing the district from tunneling deeper.

And that’s a good thing for taxpayers, who got thrown into that hole with no ladder. But is it a good thing for the school board and administration? Does it help them learn their lesson, or is it just a baby sitter coming in to do their homework for them?

It’s going to take a lot of work for the district, and no doubt a lot of sacrifice for the residents, to actually fill the hole, but it’s a process that can’t be done via shortcut. You can’t cover it up and pretend it’s not there and ignore why.

That just invites someone to fall into the same pit again.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.