Editorial: Pennsylvania gave women voice with vote | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Pennsylvania gave women voice with vote


Women get to have a say.

That shouldn’t surprise anyone. It should seem obvious. Of course a woman gets a seat at the table, a voice in a discussion. Of course all women should have that opportunity.

But it was just 100 years ago that Pennsylvania said that, yes, every woman has the same right to cast a vote as every man.

The Keystone State — the second to ratify the U.S. Constitution — was the seventh to ratify the 19th Amendment on June 24, 1919.

A century later, women are having an explosion of political involvement that suffrage advocates such as Sojourner Truth, Susan B. Anthony, Julia Ward Howe and Alice Paul dreamed was possible.

It’s the kind of future that Abigail Adams imagined as she urged her one-day president husband to not to neglect women in forging a new nation. In a March 1776 letter to John Adams during the Continental Congress, she pressed him, telling the revolutionary leader that “if particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.”

The vote to ratify the amendment took 143 years from that warning. Today, we have an impressive number of women office-holders, not just in Congress after the 2018 midterms but in women exercising their political muscles in local government, school boards, county seats and state positions.

Women have taken the right to vote and forged those ballots into a lever, using it to pry open the doors to the halls of power. They have piled up those ballots to serve as soap boxes to advance causes. They have rolled those ballots into megaphones to shout a message of involvement and a call to arms.

And it is important to note that this is not partisan. Women are speaking and running and governing and voting, but they are not doing it with one voice because — just like men — women are a mixture of experiences and backgrounds and aspirations that refuses to be pigeonholed.

A woman ran for president in 2016 as a Democrat, but one also ran as a Republican. More are running for the 2020 Democratic nomination, but some of their greatest critics are women in the GOP. President Trump’s election has energized a large and vocal contingent of women to action, but he owes his 2016 election to women who voted for him.

For 100 years now, women have legally had a say in their world. Whether you use it to whisper, cajole, caution or shout, make yourself heard.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.