ShareThis Page
Editorial: Pittsburgh schools reduced pot penalties puzzling | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Pittsburgh schools reduced pot penalties puzzling

833155_web1_gtr-op-CPRemington-021719

Pennsylvania has yet to decide on the future of marijuana.

Yes, it’s legal for medicinal purposes. Yes, the possibility of recreational use is being explored.

There are very real reasons why that should be on the table. Why should alcohol be OK for frivolous consumption but marijuana isn’t? Valid question. But it’s still a question.

That’s what makes the Pittsburgh Public Schools decision to make changes to penalties for student possession both premature and confusing.

First offenders have traditionally faced a 10-day suspension that might be served through alternative placement in the Student Achievement Center for a minimum of 45 days.

The new protocol would give the option of a five-day suspension in exchange for meeting with counselors and taking a drug treatment course.

The district’s goal of taking less punitive stances on minor, nonviolent infractions is understandable. The brass ring is to teach kids, not act as a de facto prison camp.

But a mid-year switch in policy in the midst of a statewide conversation about recreational legalization and the increased possible availability of marijuana in homes because of medicinal dispensaries is troublesome. Making possession of a controlled substance less of a big deal seems like minimization at a time when lines are already being blurred.

Westmoreland County Detective Tony Marcocci expressed concerns about recreational legalization in a recent Tribune-Review editorial board meeting, in part because of the increased levels of THC in today’s marijuana. He also had concerns with the amount of drug use being seen in schools, but agreed with marijuana’s medicinal value.

There are many things that we use medicinally that we wouldn’t encourage our kids to use for fun. They aren’t allowed to bring nighttime cold medicine to class and take shots between English and chemistry. In reality, we have recognized that kids have abused perfectly legal substances like cough syrup and computer duster and made them more challenging to access.

At a time when opioids and prescription drugs are a huge concern, it seems like we need to draw the lines more sharply, not brush them away. With the smoke not cleared on marijuana’s future, why change the game now?

No, Pittsburgh Public Schools isn’t eliminating all penalty. But this seems like the wrong message at the wrong time.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.