ShareThis Page
Editorial: Police just did their job |

Editorial: Police just did their job

| Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:30 p.m

They did what they are there to do.

When two Westmoreland County residents seemingly disappeared on Thursday, Greensburg police didn’t brush it off. They didn’t say “come back in a week and let us know if they show up.” They didn’t raise an eyebrow and throw the report on a pile of files about stolen bikes and lost dogs.

Two families and co-workers said they were afraid something was wrong, and the police said they would help.

Because that is their job.

Police don’t get to pass judgment on emergencies when someone’s life could be in danger. First responders of all kinds have to put human safety first.

Sometimes that means that they turn up to an emergency that was less than emergent. Maybe that prowler in the bushes is a raccoon. Maybe that guy trying to break in the side door is a kid who broke curfew and lost his key.

But maybe it isn’t. Or maybe next time, it won’t be.

“It was the result we all were hoping for … everybody was safe. Given the exact same set of circumstances, we’d investigate it the same way again,” Greensburg police Capt. Robert Stafford said. “We’re police. That’s what we’re supposed to do.”

Yes, it is. And for every one or two or ten calls where something turns out to be nothing, there is the one, the horrible one, where what could easily have been nothing is actually exactly what everyone feared.

Too many police officers have gone back to families with the crippling message no one wants to deliver or hear.

Others are haunted by the cases that were never solved, where parents or spouses or children continue for years to hold out the hope that someday someone will give them an answer to where this person they loved went and what happened to them.

So while social media may have been dubious about the seriousness with which police undertook a search for two adults whose weeknight date ended up evolving into an impromptu interstate road trip, the investigators don’t have the luxury of looking at the million ways things could have gone right.

Their focus, just like when they direct traffic or respond to a domestic disturbance or even approach the window of a car they have pulled over for a broken taillight, has to be on the handful of ways it could have gone wrong.

“Can you imagine if we didn’t do anything and something bad occurred?” Stafford said.

Yes, we can, and we would have been among the first taking the department to task for it. We are happy, instead, to defend them for doing their job.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.