Editorial: Primaries should be open to all | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: Primaries should be open to all


In a Penn Township, Westmoreland County, precinct, a woman stood confused as she looked at her ballot.

“These are all the candidates? The one I was voting for isn’t here.”

The poll worker explained to her that all the candidates she was allowed to vote for were on the ballot. The candidate she wanted wasn’t in her party, so she couldn’t make that choice.

That is the Pennsylvania primary system in a nutshell.

The state has a closed primary. If you want to pick which Democrats are going to move on to the general election in November, you can’t be registered as a Republican in the spring.

If you want to cross party lines and say, “I don’t like any of these options,” you have to plan ahead in the Keystone State. Neighbors like New York and New Jersey are similar.

But not all states do it that way. In Ohio, voters don’t register as party members, but request the ballot of their party at the poll or remain unaffiliated and just vote on referendums or amendments. In West Virginia primaries, unaffiliated voters can pick either ballot, but those who registered as a party member are limited to that party.

Nationwide, the options range from Election Day registration with wide-open options to rigid rules like Pennsylvania and a lot in between.

The woman voting in Penn Township couldn’t understand the restriction. She’s not alone. Plenty of people have advocated for updating the process to at least allow voters who aren’t R’s or D’s to have a say.

In June, the state Senate voted 42 to 8 for a change that would let the hundreds of thousands of unaffiliated voters choose a Republican or Democratic ballot on a primary election day.

The state House should follow suit and give Pennsylvania voters — regardless of which team they support — the opportunity to raise their voices in every election, not just in November.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.