Editorial: Progress or caution with turnpike proposal? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Progress or caution with turnpike proposal?

1440275_web1_Turnpike-interchange2
Tribune-Review

Development always seems like a good idea.

It’s expansion. It’s growth. And generally, yes, that can be great.

Our leaders are responsible not just to maintain the status quo but to keep an eye on the future. That means we have to grow. We need younger residents to feed the economy as the population ages. We need new workers to replace retirees. We need caregivers to support our sick or elderly.

The Westmoreland County Comprehensive Plan approved in December recognizes that, looking to increase growth in both population and the economy.

The proposed Pennsylvania Turnpike interchange in Penn Township would seem in line with that.

In a county struggling to grow, Penn Township seems poised to bloom. The Route 130 area where the turnpike commission has approved adding cashless ramps in the new 10-year plan is a good middle ground between the Monroeville exit on one side and the Irwin exit on the other. It has easy access to Greensburg and Murrysville.

So why is there any hesitation?

Because it is responsible for leaders not just to ask for what they believe would be best for a community but to question if the manner in which it is being done is appropriate.

“I don’t know what impact it will have if it goes through,” said Jeff Shula, president of the Penn Township Board of Commissioners.

That’s true. The roadwork done at that intersection this year has created long snarls.

Is it possible Route 130 can’t handle a greater influx of traffic? Widening the road could be a $38 million proposition that could hurt some businesses as much as it helps others. Does too much growth too fast make sense?

Shula is right to ask about the impact just as area legislators were right to advocate for the interchange’s inclusion on the long term plan. Both voices are necessary in a conversation to find answers.

But with the ramps on the plan, real conversations about the overlap of the roads — and the goals — can take off.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.