Editorial: School choice should be discussed, not automatic | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: School choice should be discussed, not automatic


Picking a school for your child can be a very personal decision.

You weigh the pros and cons. You might look at test scores. You might look at graduation rates. You might be looking for just the right fit for your religious beliefs. Maybe you want a private institution that fits with your social values or your child’s career goals. Maybe you just like the message a certain school sends.

All of those are valid reasons to make a decision. All could prompt you to write a check to the admissions office. That might cost you about $10,000, like Greensburg Central Catholic. It might cost close to $32,000 like high school at Shady Side Academy. But that’s your decision to make.

So why is Pennsylvania okay underwriting that decision?

Since 2001, lawmakers have been bumping up the Education Improvement Tax Credit cap. That’s an amount of money the state forgoes in taxes to underwrite private school scholarships and public school foundations. Last year, House Speaker Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, pushed through approval to up the funds by $35 million. That’s roughly the general operating budget of a not-too-small school district. Highlands, for example, had a budget of about $40 million last year.

Now Turzai and 43 bipartisan co-sponsors want to increase that again, taking the total amount of money in the program from $160 million to a whopping $260 million, allowing thousands of families that make up to $116,216 a year to get a helping hand from the state in subsidizing private or parochial school choices.

The new proposal would also put automatic increases into the program to keep the snowball rolling — and growing.

There are valid arguments for school choice programs. They can provide access to a specific learning experience that may better fit a child or a family. There are equally valid arguments against school choice. It pulls money out of public education when those funds need to be built up, not depleted.

But regardless of which side of the issue you fall, it needs to be debated. A decision as personal and important as how and where our children are educated deserves to be discussed, not set on auto-pilot.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.