Editorial: Show volunteers they are valued | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Show volunteers they are valued

1888499_web1_FireTruckA

We can’t afford to lose the people who keep us safe.

But we are.

In Pennsylvania, there are 2,463 fire companies. More than 90% of them are staffed by volunteers. According to state Rep. Bob Brooks, R-Murrysville, the number of firefighters had been falling for 30 years or so when it hit 68,000 first responders in the early 2000s.

In 2018, it had fallen further, hitting 38,000.

In a state of 12.8 million people, that means just one volunteer firefighter out of every 337 people. Or, to rephrase, just one volunteer firefighter protecting every 337 people.

That’s not enough. We need more, especially considering the firefighters we do have are getting older. According to the National Volunteer Fire Council, the average age is 50. That makes recruiting younger volunteers all the more critical.

A 2016 law gave municipalities the ability to offer a property tax credit to first responders to encourage more volunteers to get involved.

Brooks has proposed an expansion of that act that would allow counties to offer the same option, while boosting local allowances from 20% of an active volunteer’s tax liability up to the full 100%.

“Recruitment and retention of volunteers in our emergency services community is vital, and our local companies are suffering from the lack of ability to recruit and maintain volunteers,” Brooks said.

The legislator called it a way to say thank you to emergency personnel. It is more than that.

It is a way to express the value of what firefighters and other volunteer emergency providers do, which is save our lives and our homes, at the risk of their own lives.

Brooks’ bill passed the House with a unanimous vote. The state Senate should do the same.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.