Editorial: Shut down shutdowns | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Shut down shutdowns

683339_web1_550644-84cb23aafe7e4b47aa50b54d0d3a3048

The longest government shutdown may have done the impossible.

It got some Republicans and Democrats to agree on the need for some kind of wall. Unfortunately for President Trump, what they want to wall off is the option to shut down the federal government.

Legislators from both parties have openly said they don’t want to see the kind of thing that happened with the 35-day impasse that ended Friday happen again.

“Shutting down the government should be as off-limits in budget negotiations as chemical warfare is in real warfare,” said the GOP’s Sen. Lamar Alexander on Friday.

Other Republicans were equally outspoken, including Sen. Rob Portman, who put out a plan that would keep government tripping along amid negotiations, with stepped 1 percent cuts after four months and seven months as a nudge to keep the conversation on track.

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner countered with his own plan, poignantly named the Stop STUPIDITY Act. His idea? If you’re going to cut funding to something, make it Congress and the White House.

Lots of people have had ideas about how to end shutdowns. Lock people in a room. Don’t let people go home until a compromise is reached. Be tough. Be accommodating. Come to the table. Walk away. Make them come to you. Whatever you do, be sure you come out on top.

Now that we have almost three weeks to make sure there is no encore of the recent contest of wills, maybe our leaders can focus on solutions instead of wins.

But once that’s past, let’s revisit Alexander’s and Warner’s ideas but do them one better.

Instead of finding a way out of a shutdown, let’s find a way to prevent one. (Harrisburg? You could pay attention to this, too.)

Maybe we could actually make and stick by a budget. No stop-gap measures and continuing resolutions. Let’s make a new budget, or let’s keep going under the old one.

Let’s quit pulling out switchblades over the debt ceiling votes and realize that we have no choice when it comes to paying for things we already said we would pay. Let’s say that when we have a good idea for a program we want to fund, we make paying for it part of passing it.

Let’s require our federal government to run things, if not the way we run our homes, then at least the way we demand lower levels of government work.

A school board doesn’t get to close school just because there is disagreement about paying for STEM or paying for music. Pennsylvania schools have kept going even when Harrisburg’s budget tantrums have meant months of borrowing to cover shortfalls.

And if the people in Washington can’t find a way to make this work, let’s find people who can.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.