Editorial: There is no one way to stop shootings | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: There is no one way to stop shootings


There is no way to stop someone brimming with fear and goaded by hatred, fueled by insecurity and propelled by prejudice.

We have to stop this grappling to find the Holy Grail solution that will solve the tragic trouble of mass murder.

It isn’t one answer.

It is a complicated, knotted, interconnected web of problems, so why wouldn’t the solution be just as convoluted?

Is it guns? Of course guns are part of it. Guns are the weapon of choice, so they have to be addressed.

But anyone who believes that preventing the next Dayton, the next El Paso, the next Gilroy or Thousand Oaks or Tree of Life is as easy as making this gun illegal or that ammunition illegal or making all guns illegal is not paying attention to the larger picture.

Those people who counter gun control arguments with “What about knives? Or bombs? Or trucks?” aren’t wrong. Evil will find a way.

The counter is about mental health. Everyone could use more mental health care. Do that. But don’t pretend that it is a substitute for addressing other aspects.

We need to look beyond those two favorite cudgels of the left and right and look at all of the things that could contribute to building a mass murderer.

Some start with domestic violence. Let’s better address the failings of our protection from abuse system.

Some could have been prevented by earlier interactions with law enforcement. Let’s increase communication between agencies and tighten response.

Some people haven’t failed background checks to acquire weapons — the background checks have failed to share disqualifications like military criminality. Let’s make the laws we already have function the way they were intended.

And some attacks start with white supremacy and hatred that is a rattlesnake-like fear. These are the most difficult issues to address, because we can’t make people not hate each other.

Let’s address the economic issues that make people afraid someone else will take their jobs. Let’s address the political divides that makes them feel someone else will steal their voice. Let’s address the educational faltering that makes people not understand each other.

We are 50 years removed from sending a rocket to the stars, taking a walk on the moon and returning safely. We didn’t get there by arguing about whether the rocket or the return was more important. We recognized all of the moving parts were critical and leaving any of them out would make the whole endeavor fail.

We don’t need to argue about what one thing will end mass shootings. One thing won’t.

Many things could.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.