ShareThis Page
Editorial: Veto shows how Washington is supposed to work | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Veto shows how Washington is supposed to work

889862_web1_889286-76876344c52a42c7adad3fbc5ec99b63

President Trump has signed his name on a lot of things since taking office.

Executive orders. Bills he signed into law. Bibles for fans in tornado-torn Alabama.

But on Friday, he signed something new. A veto.

For the first time in his presidency, the Senate and the House of Representatives stood together and denied him something he wanted. In this case, it was the national emergency Trump declared that would allow him to shuffle billions in congressionally appropriated funds to pay for a southern border wall that was a key campaign promise.

Twelve Republican senators joined with the Democrats to tell the president “no.” Both Pennsylvania senators — Republican Pat Toomey and Democrat Bob Casey — approved the resolution and stood opposed to the White House.

Regardless of whether anyone supports the wall on the Mexican border or believes we need less structure and more support on that front, we should applaud what happened with the resolution — and the veto.

Because that’s how the system is supposed to work.

For too long, Washington has devolved into short cuts in the process.

Bills have only been brought up for debate if the leadership had already counted up the votes and decided whether they would pass. They have forgotten that the debate is the point. The debate is where those 435 people in the House and those 100 in the Senate are supposed to set aside their preconceptions and prejudices and listen to the arguments of their friends and their enemies alike.

Like juries, they are supposed to be open to the facts as presented and the oratory of statesmen — if we have any left.

Votes are not supposed to be poker chips traded off the floor in back room games we don’t see. They are definitely not supposed to be something that is automatically assumed because of party.

We are supposed to have ideas that become bills that spark conversation and thought before dying on the floor or being passed and sent to the White House to become law or be vetoed. That happened, and that’s a good thing.

It isn’t over yet. Maybe the House will find the two-thirds majority it needs to quash the president’s veto. Maybe they won’t and it will stand. Again, either way, that is how it is supposed to work, and whatever happens, that’s a positive.

Because Washington has forgotten the rules for quite a while. Maybe Trump’s first veto will help them all remember.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.