Editorial: What do we expect from black boys, rich kids? | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: What do we expect from black boys, rich kids?

Thomas Potter, 14, of East Pittsburgh, and friend of Antwon Rose, breaks down in tears as the second night of protests get underway on June 20, 2018.
Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld, charged with homicide in the shooting death of Antwon Rose II, walks to the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg, Pa., Tuesday, March 12, 2019.

Former East Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Rosfeld’s trial starts Tuesday.

Barring a plea or other last-minute changes, a jury will decide if he is guilty of criminal homicide in the June 19th death of Antwon Rose II.

Rose’s story is one in a long line of high-profile shootings of black men by police officers.

Except for one thing. Rose wasn’t a black man.

Rose was 17 years old. Rose may have stood eye to eye with men. He may have worn men’s shoes and worn men’s sized clothes. He may not have played with Legos or Matchbox cars anymore, but Rose was not a man. Legally, he was a boy.

Rose isn’t the only example. When Tamir Rice was shot in Cleveland in 2014, he was 12. He was also 5 foot 7 inches tall. Police said they believed he was older. That is a recurrent theme.

While Pittsburgh’s eyes are focused on the courthouse, the rest of the world is paying attention to newer stories, like the college admissions scandal in which dozens of very wealthy parents — CEO’s and celebrities — paid thousands of dollars to cheat on tests and hundreds of thousands to bribe their children’s way into exclusive colleges.

Olivia Jade Giannulli is the daughter of actress Lori Loughlin and designer Mossimo Giannulli. She is 19. Two years older than Rose was when he died. Yet when the scandal is discussed, no one ever calls her a woman. She’s a girl, or a kid.

What is the difference? Is it that Giannulli is white? Female? Rich? Why do we expect more maturity of the young black minor from the city than an older white minor whose parents are worth $100 million?

Legally, this shouldn’t be a question. We decided a long time ago that 18 is the age of responsibility. We didn’t set different standards by sex or skin color or bank balance.

If raising kids is supposed to take a village, the village needs to get its collective act together because every day our kids are getting mixed messages about their place in the world and how they are supposed to get there.

We have to let our kids be kids while they can. We have to let our young adults grow up when it’s time. We have to stop having a sliding scale of responsibility and expectations that sees us burying children too young and sending “kids” into the world instead of adults because we didn’t teach them how to stand on their own.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.