Editorial: What happens now with church abuse | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: What happens now with church abuse

1535973_web1_ptr-pghdiocese03-081518

It’s been a year.

One year since the scope of the Catholic church sex scandal was dragged into the light of day.

One year since Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro released the grand jury report that detailed 70 years of children being abused — first when their bodies were touched and then again when their pain was denied.

Pennsylvanians and Catholics experienced the shock and shame of finding that the churches and schools that are so woven into the fabric of our lives and landscapes have been the sanctuary of generations of predators.

And that was the beginning.

What came next?

Lawyer Thomas P. Doyle is not just a consultant working with other states the way he worked with Pennsylvania’s grand jury. He is a former priest. He understands the church inside out. He calls what happened here “a catalyst for other states.”

“They’re realizing after Pennsylvania did what they did, is it can be done,” he told the Tribune- Review.

The volume of information — things like abused boys identified with gold crosses and a girl tricked into a sham marriage — attracted world attention. It didn’t just release horrible details. It showed the symmetry of how diocese after diocese followed a pattern of concealment that was nearly as ritualized as a rosary.

The church has taken steps to atone. The penance has been public — stripping the names of former bishops like Pittsburgh and Washington, D.C.’s Cardinal Donald Wuerl and the late Greensburg Bishop William Connare from buildings. There have been compensation funds established to handle claims from victims.

Those payouts are less public. The Pittsburgh Diocese fund has had 149 claims and issued 36 determinations to date, but has not released the amounts. Greensburg Diocese says it will release numbers when they are more complete.

There has been progress in the last year, but not in the state Senate, where there has been resistance to changing law to allow a two-year window for adult survivors to file lawsuits.

It took 70 years to bring the abuse out of the dark.

It took another year to get to a place where more victims have stepped forward, more charges have been filed and more progress has been made in making the focus on protecting the abused instead of the abusers.

How long will it take for the law to catch up?

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.