ShareThis Page
Editorial: What is a crisis? |

Editorial: What is a crisis?

| Wednesday, January 9, 2019 11:30 a.m

A crisis is a fork in the road. Go one way, things get better. Go another, they get worse.

It’s a word that came up repeatedly Tuesday as President Trump gave his first national address on the government shutdown and the situation on the southern border.

It is a humanitarian crisis, he said. It is a security crisis.

“It is a crisis of the heart and a crisis of the soul,” he said, starting with words of concern for the women and children making the journey from Central American countries through Mexico, but ending with a litany of crimes committed by illegal aliens.

The solution, he said, is the wall he promised during the campaign. A wall that is the sticking point in negotiations to end the shutdown. A wall he promised Mexico would fund. A wall that could lead to the declaration of a state of emergency.

The wall, it seems, is the crisis more than the immigrants it would keep out.

Illegal immigration, after all, is at an 11-year low, according to federal government numbers. Illegal immigration on the southern border? That’s down 78 percent since 2000, again based on Trump’s own administration figures.

The wall, on the other hand, is a problem that seems to be growing for both the president and the country.

Trump has already gotten $1.6 billion for the wall, and a list of contracts for replacements of existing sections of wall in Texas, Arizona and California has been announced. Another $1.3 billion was approved by the House and Senate, but the president has rejected it, holding on for the $5.7 billion he said Tuesday law enforcement has said was necessary for the wall, which is now a steel bollard barrier (although not at the request of Democrats, as Trump stated in his address).

“The fact is: We all agree that we need to secure our borders, while honoring our values,” Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said after the address. “We can build the infrastructure and roads at our ports of entry; we can install new technology to scan cars and trucks for drugs coming into our nation; we can hire the personnel we need to facilitate trade and immigration at the border; and we can fund more innovation to detect unauthorized crossings.”

Trump noted those kind of improvements, but went back to the wall. The wall, he said, is the only thing that will get him to re-open government. Right now, that means the wall is not standing between the U.S. and Mexico. It’s standing between 800,000 federal workers and paychecks.

If the border situation is a crisis, and Trump really does intend to follow through on his threat to declare a state of emergency and bypass congressional approval for the wall, that should have been the message delivered from the Oval Office. It wasn’t. Trump’s address was largely the same message he has been delivering for three weeks.

What was new? The fundraising emails the Trump-Pence re-election campaign sent out before the speech and after seeking to raise $500,000 off the address, something Fox News’ Harris Faulkner pressed adviser Kellyanne Conway about, saying “I thought that these speeches were not supposed to be political.”

The crisis seems entirely political.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.