Editorial: What is a worker? | TribLIVE.com

Editorial: What is a worker?

Tribune-Review file

You can’t replace a worker.

A worker isn’t an employee. The words might be listed as synonyms in the thesaurus, but there are big differences.

An employee collects a paycheck. Hasn’t everyone known an employee? That person whose main skill involves keeping a chair from floating away? Someone who gives the bare minimum of effort and huffs about not getting maximum reward?

Employees are easy to replace. Employees get replaced all the time. Employees measure their tenure in weeks or months. Employees might get a big paycheck or a big office but they don’t know what it’s like to get big respect.

Workers, on the other hand, are indispensable.

Workers come in early because clocking in on time means something to them. Workers stay late because they want the job done right.

Workers do their best because their sense of self won’t allow them to do anything else.

Workers ask for good pay because they know they are integral to the successful product of their business. They feel a part of their organization and believe that should be reciprocated.

Workers may be cogs in the machine, but they know good cogs are the difference between a functioning machine and broken junk.

And workers aren’t defined by how high or low they are in the hierarchy. Every CEO should be a good worker. So should every manager.

When we celebrate Labor Day, we take a breath and realize how much work it takes to keep our world turning the way that it does. It can be easy these days to worry about the jobs we do and what will happen to them in the future. Where will the workers go as what it means to have a job changes in a landscape of robots and artificial technology and self-driving cars?

Employees should worry about that.

But there will always be a place for workers.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.