Editorial: Why use a mass shooter’s name? | TribLIVE.com
Editorials

Editorial: Why use a mass shooter’s name?

908716_web1_689637-a55d63b316f94aa696f6b7aef18a97ec

We name names.

The goal of journalism is to disseminate information. We find out who made a decision, who bought a business, who staged a protest, who won a prize, who died in a crash, who saved a life. And we name names.

There are times that we pull the punch.

We protect children. We protect rape victims. We may, on occasion, protect a source if the information is more important than the name, but, to be honest, we don’t like anonymous sources any more than the public does, so that is rare.

But when people are accused of a crime, they are not protected. If you are charged with stealing from the school district, we name you. If you are prosecuted for assaulting a child, we name you. If police say you caused a crash while driving drunk, we name you.

As mass shootings become more and more common, some people want us to stop using the names of the shooters.

“A lot of these shooters want to be treated like celebrities. They want to be famous. So the key is to not give them that treatment,” Adam Lankford, University of Alabama criminologist, said in a recent AP story.

The prime minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, has vowed she will never speak the name of the man who murdered 50 people in two Christchurch mosques last week.

Families of victims have noted that their loved ones’ names are lost in the blur of coverage while the shooters — whether arrested or killed — are always remembered. That has to be acid on the raw nerves of their grief.

But is silence on the shooters’ names the right call?

We cannot ignore the shootings, and the shootings don’t happen in a vacuum. To cover the event without naming the perpetrator or the accused is to talk about the destruction of New Orleans without mentioning Hurricane Katrina. It is noting the collapse of the Twin Towers but disregarding the planes. It is a catastrophe out of context.

If we applied this rule to the Tree of Life shooting, our coverage would end as the memorials disappeared. How do we cover the prosecution of a ghost we can’t name? The victims deserve justice, and there is no justice without truth. The community deserves accountability, and there can’t be accountability behind a veil.

What we can do is strive for honesty. For a lack of glorification. For attention on the fallen. For commitment to find answers to how a tragedy happened and how another might be prevented.

But we name names.

Categories: Opinion | Editorials
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.