ShareThis Page
Editorials

Alle-Kiski Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, March 24, 2016, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To combining forces: The Apollo No. 3 and North Apollo VFDs are undertaking a plan to consolidate. Huzzah! Given that the number of volunteers continues to drop and the cost of training, equipment, etc. continues to rise, we wonder why more departments aren't doing this. Could it be parochialism, petty rivalries and power-mongering? We hope not.

Lance: To Kiski Area school officials. Since February, Kiski elementary school principal Jeffrey Jackson has been “absent,” says the district — and not another word. The school board approved an agreement with Jackson on Monday — without another word. Since all contracts — not a few, not some — involving the district are publc record, we asked for a copy and were denied. We filed a Right-to-Know request and were told the district needs another 30 days to research the matter. That's its right under the law, but Kiski residents are paying for whatever is in that agreement. They deserve an explanation.

Laurel: To VonZell Wade. A former crack cocaine addict and dealer in the '80s and early '90s, the ex-con turned around his life. Wade got clean, worked and went to school. He now holds a Ph.D. in counseling and along with his wife, Laurie, runs Lost Dreams Awakening, a nonprofit addiction counseling center in New Kensington. Wade, who we profiled on Sunday, may be an exception among addicts, but he certainly is a sterling one.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me