ShareThis Page
Editorials

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2016, 9:00 p.m.

Now in the home stretch of the presidential election, which at this point seems interminable for frustrated voters, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are just about even in abysmal disapproval ratings among registered voters — 59 percent and 60 percent, respectively, in a Washington Post-ABC News pre-Labor Day poll. Pundits nevertheless say just about anything can happen between now and Election Day. The question is, will unhappy voters notice as they mute the coming storm of political TV ads? … The less-than royal treatment afforded President Obama on his arrival at the G20 Summit in China is nothing to get worked up over, the president says. There was no mobile staircase after Air Force One landed in Hangzhou and no red carpet. Chinese officials blocked the media from watching the president disembark and shouted at a U.S. diplomat. Apparently “things like this had happened” on other presidential excursions, Mr. Obama says. It's called “respect,” Mr. President — specifically, the lack thereof. … We mourn the death on Monday of Phyllis Schlafly, 92, whose many insights and books include “A Choice Not an Echo” in 1964. More than support Barry Goldwater's presidential bid, she fired a broadside at a “small group of secret kingmakers” within the GOP establishment at the time. She always stood up for what she believed. Yet the liberal chorus that today cries out for civility in politics demeans her passing. How truly pathetic.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me