ShareThis Page

Tim Murphy's undoing: A legacy realized

| Thursday, Oct. 5, 2017, 9:30 a.m.
Rep. Tim Murphy speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington.  (AP Photo)
Rep. Tim Murphy speaks on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo)

It was only a matter of time — too long for his critics — before the hypocrisy that defines the “Republican” tenure of U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy would eventually bury him. Now up to his neck in allegations that the pro-life lawmaker asked his mistress to get an abortion, Mr. Murphy has announced his resignation, effective Oct. 21.

And conservatives misrepresented by Murphy for 15 years in the primarily Republican 18th District can breathe a sigh of relief that the reign of this RINO is over. Anyone who knows Mr. Murphy's legislative record knows he's no stranger to glaring political inconsistencies.

The representative from Upper St. Clair, who normally swings to the left but inevitably creeps back to the right before each election cycle, initially supported “card check” to curry favor with Big Labor in 2007 until doing so became politically inexpedient. He has opposed limiting the cost-inflating Davis-Bacon Act on public works projects. On prevailing-wage laws, project-labor agreements, minimum wages and even the absurd Obama-era Cash for Clunkers escapade, he's been a lock-stepping, union-toadying liberal.

And Big Government Murphy, who says he's anything but, has voted consistently against legislation to cut pork-barrel spending, according to his critics.

So anyone following along shouldn't be the least bit surprised by Murphy's flair for saying one thing — and doing another. Given these latest appalling allegations, he simply sealed his own pathetic legacy.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me