ShareThis Page

Trib editorial: Pa. School Code changes benefit students

| Thursday, Nov. 9, 2017, 8:55 p.m.
AFP | Getty Images
AFP/Getty Images
AFP | Getty Images

Some of the most sweeping changes in Pennsylvania's Public School Code in recent years will boost opportunities for school choice and retain the best teachers during staff furloughs.

The multifaceted legislation, HB 178, automatically became law after Gov. Tom Wolf opted not to sign or veto the bill within the requisite 10-day period. Contained therein are reforms that should make a meaningful difference — for students.

Among other things, the legislation increases the amount of tax credits under the Educational Improvement Tax Credit Program (EITC) from $125 million to $135 million. EITC allows state businesses to divert a portion of their taxes to scholarship organizations, which in turn provide private-school scholarships to Pennsylvania families trapped in poorly performing schools. Hence, more school choice.

Not only have studies found that school choice improves student outcomes — notably in Washington, D.C., for low-income children — these initiatives over the years have saved taxpayers more than $1 billion because the alternative often costs less than traditional public schools, according to the Commonwealth Foundation.

The new law also requires districts to review teacher performance over seniority when economic conditions dictate furloughs. Clearly the fate of teachers in these situations shouldn't be determined solely on when they were hired. Moreover, “last in, first out” doesn't necessarily benefit students.

And putting students first should be the substance of any reform.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me