ShareThis Page

The Thursday wrap

| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Opinions from Western Pennsylvanians on the $1.5 trillion tax overhaul passed by the Senate vary from those who support its reduction in the corporate tax rate (from 35 to 20 percent in 2019) to those angry over eliminated tax deductions. But until the Senate and House tax bills are melded into one and go to a vote, the tax package remains a moving target. So snap judgments may be a tad premature. What is for sure, if a tax package ultimately passes both houses of Congress and gets President Trump's signature, is that what's proposed will be the most sweeping overhaul since the 1980s. ... Freshwater mussels aren't very large, but they're a big thing to turn up in the Kiski River—reportedly after more than a century. And the one captured in an award-winning photograph by Chelsea Walker, a watershed specialist with the Westmoreland County Conservation District and volunteer board member of the Roaring Run and Kiskiminetas watershed associations, shows what authorities say is a pregnant female that's at least 7 years old. Experts say that's good news for a river once in “fearful condition” because of coal-mining drainage. ... Yet another teacher faces a charge of institutional sexual assault for allegedly having sex with a male student. Jordan Dominique Ondish, 24, of Washington Township, has been fired from Summit Academy, a private, nonprofit educational rehabilitation facility for juvenile offenders in Butler County. At what point do supposedly adult, educated teachers learn about where such deviant trysts typically end up?

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me