ShareThis Page

Trib editorial: Opioid-prescription reductions show Pa.'s monitoring program off to promising start

| Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
OxyContin, an opioid painkiller.
OxyContin, an opioid painkiller.

Reducing opioid prescriptions — too often, gateways to abusing street drugs — is an essential public-health part of the overall addiction battle, which must include law enforcement, too. Pennsylvania's recent efforts toward that end have a long way to go but are starting to bear fruit, suggesting the Keystone State is on the right track.

The state Health Department's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program began operating in mid-2016, countering “doctor-shopping” with a registry that doctors can check before prescribing opioids. Program data released under Gov. Tom Wolf's Jan. 10 statewide opioid-crisis disaster declaration show opioid-prescription numbers dropped in 2017's third quarter by about 13 percent in Allegheny County, 9.3 percent in Westmoreland County and 11 percent statewide.

That's a start, but the numbers remain too high, according to Dr. Rachel Levine, state physician general and acting Health secretary. She says “medical professionals have to learn to use opioids more carefully,” and better, wider use of guidelines on prescribing for patients who have chronic pain unrelated to cancer will help. Dr. Karen Hacker, Allegheny County Health Department director, says insurers also are playing an important role.

Of course, patients with genuine medical needs for opioid prescriptions must continue to get them. But redoubling efforts to reduce opioid-prescription abuse is an indispensable component of the larger addiction fight. Hopefully, updated data will show there's more to those efforts than just a promising start.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me