ShareThis Page

Trib editorial: Frat recruiting & students' safety

| Friday, Feb. 23, 2018, 8:57 p.m.
West Virginia President E. Gordon Gee (Trib photo)
Barry Reeger | Trib Total Media
West Virginia President E. Gordon Gee (Trib photo)

“Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son.”

The often-quoted line from the fictional character Dean Vernon Wormer, played for comic effect in the movie “Animal House,” sadly has application amid reports of alcohol-infused college fraternity hazings and drunken parties that lead to serious injuries and, in some cases, tragedies.

West Virginia University is the latest to issue a wake-up call.

The campus in Morgantown has temporarily banned 16 fraternities from engaging in social recruiting activities in response to “continued behavior issues.” More specifics would be helpful. According to WVU President E. Gordon Gee, “I cannot in good conscience as your president stand by and do nothing.”

The announcement follows recent fraternity incidents elsewhere, including a University of Pittsburgh student hospitalized last month for alcohol poisoning after an off-campus fraternity-recruitment event. Far more disturbing is the death of Penn State student Timothy Piazza, 19, who fell down a flight of stairs at a fraternity house. His fraternity “brothers” reportedly waited 12 hours before calling for help.

College life, as we've opined, is a rite of passage — a corridor of options en route to adulthood. Mistakes are made and lessons are learned. Better for the fraternities, themselves, to address any activities that obviously cross the line. Failing that, it's up to colleges to step up for the safety of their students.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me