ShareThis Page

Trib editorial: 100,000-plus noncitizen Pa. voters? Withheld records hold answer

| Monday, March 5, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Tribune-Review archives

The difficulty of nailing down genuine facts and valid statistics fuels controversies over electoral integrity. And when public officials withhold relevant data that could clear things up — as the Pennsylvania Department of State is doing regarding allegations that 100,000-plus noncitizens have registered to vote in the commonwealth — it's even harder to evaluate claims of improprieties.

The Associated Press reports state officials admit that a glitch was present when the electronic driver's-license system was implemented in the late 1990s. That allowed noncitizens to register inadvertently through late last year, when it finally was fixed. Last fall, state officials said noncitizens might have illegally cast 544 ballots out of 93 million — one in 172,000 — in 35 elections from 2000 to 2017.

In December, a Philadelphia elections official told a legislative committee that a State comparison of voter and driver's-license records indicated more than 100,000 noncitizens had registered. That prompted the conservative Public Interest Legal Foundation to demand access to relevant records; State refused. Now, PILF has filed a federal lawsuit seeking access.

The department isn't commenting on that litigation. But it denies the 100,000 figure is valid — yet won't say just how many noncitizens have registered. Especially with the 18th Congressional District special election at hand, that number should be clear — and would be, were relevant records public. The sooner this controversy's cleared up, the better for electoral integrity — and the public's trust therein.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me