ShareThis Page

Quotables: Rick Saccone straight up

| Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Republican Rick Saccone, running for Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District, talks to the Tribune-Review editorial board in Greensburg.
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Republican Rick Saccone, running for Pennsylvania's 18th Congressional District, talks to the Tribune-Review editorial board in Greensburg.

The March 13 special election to fill the 18th Congressional District seat comes down to experience, says Republican Rick Saccone. As a state lawmaker, veteran Air Force officer and intelligence officer, Mr. Saccone, 60, says his qualifications outdistance those of his Democratic opponent, Conor Lamb, 33, a former Marine and federal prosecutor. Appearing before the Trib's editorial board, the lawmaker from Elizabeth underscored his efforts to work across the aisle in Harrisburg on various bills, which have included the Castle Doctrine, tort reform and property-tax reform, in addition to 12 bills passed by lawmakers that address the opioid crisis. Beyond state issues, Saccone says his experience working in North Korea on behalf of a South Korean contractor qualifies him for a seat at the table in foreign-policy discussions.

“He (Conor Lamb) has really no life experience at all. He has one political appointee job. He never worked in the private sector. I've had 40 years of life experience in education, diplomacy, the military, government and international business. There is no match for that. If this were any other race than a special election, there would be no contest.”

“I was one of the Spartans who held the line at Thermopylae in Harrisburg when the governor wanted a $5 billion tax increase.”

The opioid epidemic is “not just a legislative problem; it's not just a law enforcement problem. It's an all-hands-on-deck problem. It's a community problem. It's a societal problem. It crosses all boundaries.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me