ShareThis Page
Editorials

Editorial: Kathleen Kane's day has come

| Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2018, 4:33 p.m.
FILE - In this Monday, Oct. 24, 2016, file photo, former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane arrives at Montgomery County courthouse for her sentencing hearing in Norristown, Pa. The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018, announced it will not review Kane's conviction for leaking grand jury information and lying about it, and the Montgomery County district attorney's office said it plans to ask a judge the following morning to revoke her bail. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)
FILE - In this Monday, Oct. 24, 2016, file photo, former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane arrives at Montgomery County courthouse for her sentencing hearing in Norristown, Pa. The Pennsylvania state Supreme Court on Monday, Nov. 26, 2018, announced it will not review Kane's conviction for leaking grand jury information and lying about it, and the Montgomery County district attorney's office said it plans to ask a judge the following morning to revoke her bail. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)

Justice delayed is justice denied, they say.

It is time for the woman who used to be charged with pursuing justice in Pennsylvania to start serving her sentence.

Two years after former attorney general Kathleen Kane was convicted of perjury, and more, in connection with a grand jury leak targeted to hurt a political rival, she is due to finally walk through the doors of the Montgomery County jail and stay there for 10 to 23 months.

Kane’s time in office was plagued by politics and scandal. Her staff changed places in a square-dance of shifting positions. Press secretary was an especially contentious position, with $10,000-a-month flak Chuck Ardo commenting on his way out the door that the office was “an unfolding series of crises that were just never-ending.”

And at every turn, it seems that Kane’s attempt to postpone the inevitable prevented nothing.

Remaining free on bail for more than two years after her conviction was just the most recent example. Kane would have been done serving her sentence by now had she not hemmed and hawed and delayed pending appeals that were finally exhausted this week when the state Supreme Court said no to hearing her case.

This is perfectly legal. Just like other convicted individuals have been able to put off serving a sentence after conviction while going through the appeals process, it is allowed. It’s just not exactly the norm. Ask almost anybody at any other county jail, where many are not just there while an appeal is progressing but while a trial is pending, too.

But Kane’s delay perpetuated a pattern.

Like a child trying to put off cleaning her room by dragging her feet and holding her breath, Kane wouldn’t step down when she was charged with a crime.

She wouldn’t step down when her license to practice law was suspended in 2015. She wouldn’t step down in 2016 as her solicitor general, Bruce Castor, rapidly moved up the ladder, doing jobs she could no longer legally perform. She continued to stand in front of Pennsylvania, collect a paycheck, keep her twin sister on the payroll and spend most of her time defending her own behavior, whether in or out of court.

“It’s anyone’s guess who is running the place,” Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman said in June 2016 .

Now it’s Montgomery County Judge Wendy Demchick-Alloy running things. She revoked Kane’s bail Wednesday and ordered a 9 a.m. Thursday deadline to report to jail.

The correctional facility where she will report has an average population of about 1,800, with more than 300 of those being women.

Everyone there had a life they were leading outside and reasons they might want to delay another day, another month, another year to enter a cell.

It’s time to stop denying justice.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me