ShareThis Page
Editorials

Pittsburgh Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, July 5, 2012, 8:44 p.m.

On the “Watch List”: Jeffrey Naftal has been hired as the new borough manager of that South Hills soap opera known as Dormont. And Mr. Naftal likely will feel right at home. He was fired from two of his prior local government administrative positions, in South Carolina and in Florida, chalked up to garden-variety political fights. It appears Naftal is battle-tested.

Laurel: To the Port Authority contract talks. Counterproductive incendiary rhetoric continues to take a back seat as unionized workers attempt to reach a new contract with Allegheny County's mass-transit agency. And there appears to be a wealth of good ideas being considered to pull the Port Authority from the abyss. That's encouraging.

Lance: To Rich Fitzgerald. A constitutionally dubious attempt by the state Legislature to override a court-ordered property reassessment in Allegheny County has been scuttled. And the ACE characterizes this as Republicans pulling “a switcheroo” that “pulled the rug out from under us”? Talk about a warped sense of the rule of law.

Laurel: To the Pirates. It's the end of the first week of July and the Buccos continue to show their competitive wherewithal. They vaulted into the lead of the National League Central with impressive wins over Houston and face a tough test this weekend with the San Francisco Giants in town. Life is good for Pirates fans right now. Here's hoping the exciting baseball and the winning continue.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me