ShareThis Page
Editorials

Greensburg Laurels & Lances

| Thursday, Nov. 19, 2015, 8:55 p.m.

Laurel: To the Greensburg YMCA. The $1 million-plus it spent on its 102-year-old building amounts to more than just a rehab; it's an investment in the Y's continued presence in the city. Here's hoping that investment will pay dividends for both the Y and the city.

On the “Watch List”:

• The future of public school budgets. Even the mention of legislation that would subject school budgets to public referendums is drawing all-too-predictable criticism from local school boards. Pennsylvanians deserve a meaningful say in the taxes they pay. And if school directors are uncomfortable with that, they shouldn't be serving — period.

• The waterworks deal. Whether selling the Ligonier Township municipal authority is in the best interests of residents depends on the value of water authority's assets and whatever “deal” the township gets, presumably from the Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County. Nothing ventured, nothing gained — so long as ratepayers are kept in the loop.

An observation: It's not surprising that Dirk Matson, co-chairman of Westmoreland's drug overdose task force, says this year is “out of control,” with drug-related deaths on pace to rise about 50 percent in 2015. If you still think illegal drug dealing isn't in your community or isn't your problem, think again.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me