ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Paul Kengor: Death what communism did best

| Saturday, Nov. 4, 2017, 10:00 p.m.
In this 2013 file photo, a woman holds a portrait of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin during a communist rally marking the Defenders of the Fatherland Day in Moscow, Russia.  (AP Photo | Mikhail Metzel)
In this 2013 file photo, a woman holds a portrait of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin during a communist rally marking the Defenders of the Fatherland Day in Moscow, Russia. (AP Photo | Mikhail Metzel)

October-November 2017 marks the 100th anniversary of the launch of the Bolshevik Revolution that made Russia a bloody communist state that would produce a political-ideological killing spree unlike any other. And yet, communism continues to find supporters.

At a conference on the legacies of communism, one liberal professor complained that no pro -communist speakers were included; I wasn't surprised. A former student of mine told me about a professor of his (at a college in Pittsburgh) hailing Karl Marx's “brilliance”; again, no surprise. And a University of Wisconsin student called a talk show I did, insisting that capitalism is just as lethal as communism. That all happened just this past week — and it's not unusual in my world.

An October 2016 poll by the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation found almost one-third of millennials “believe more people were killed under George W. Bush than under Joseph Stalin,” more than 1 in 4 Americans believe Bush was the bigger killer, 75 percent underestimate the number killed by communist regimes, and 68 percent believe Hitler killed more people than Stalin. This begs the question: How many people did these ideological gangsters kill?

“The Black Book of Communism” came up with 100 million for communism's 20th-century death toll, as did the foundation. But 100 million is actually quite conservative.

“The Black Book” recorded merely 20 million dead for the Soviet Union. Alexander Yakovlev, a high-level Soviet official who became one of Mikhail Gorbachev's chief reformers and was given the post-Cold War task of trying to tally the victims, estimates Stalin alone “annihilated ... 60 to 70 million people.”

China's Mao Zedong was responsible for at least 60 million deaths, according to “The Black Book” — but more likely over 70 million, according to the latest research. And there were the killing fields of North Korea, Cambodia, Cuba, Ethiopia, Eastern Europe, Africa and more. Communist governments' 20th-century deaths really were closer to 140 million.

Hitler killed approximately 10 million Jews, Gypsies, mentally disabled people and other “misfits.” The combined death toll from World Wars I and II was 50 million to 60 million. To begin approaching communism's mass slaughter, combine and then double the two world wars' tolls.

Ronald Reagan called communism a “disease,” but it's hard to find a 20th-century disease that killed as many. He put it better when he called communism “evil” and “a form of insanity.” And yet, so much of this evil insanity isn't known, or being taught, especially in our universities.

James Kirchick of the liberal Daily Beast recently asked, “How many times have you heard some formulation of this viewpoint? ‘Communism is an excellent idea in theory; it just hasn't worked in practice.' ” His response: “ OK. How many more millions of people have to die before we get it right? ” Good question.

As communism marks its centennial, remember it for what it did best: death.

Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include “A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me