ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Tracking the latest Amtrak accident

| Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

At least two people died and more than 100 were injured when a Miami-bound Amtrak train apparently on the wrong track ran into a stopped freight train in South Carolina. A National Transportation Safety Board official said the Amtrak train had been manually switched, diverting it from a main line and onto a side track where the freight train was parked. Reportedly the signaling system was down for maintenance. An investigation is pending along with answers to why the backup signaling system failed.

“Of course key to this investigation is learning why that switch was lined that way because the expectation is the Amtrak would be cleared and would be operating straight down” the main line.

Robert Sumwalt

Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board

“It appears that the Amtrak was on the wrong track. They weren't supposed to be meeting right there by the bridge, clearly. ... But I defer to those who are experts in that and do have the correct information.

Henry McMaster

South Carolina governor

“People were screaming. I thought I was gonna die. I didn't think I was gonna survive that. When we crashed, everyone got ejected from their seats ... . Trays all over.”

Alexandra Delgado

A Tampa, Fla., resident who boarded the Amtrak train in Raleigh, N.C.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me