ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Pat Buchanan: Nunes vs. 'deep state'

| Tuesday, Feb. 6, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Susan Walsh/AP

That memo from the Intel Committee of Chairman Devin Nunes may not have sunk the Mueller investigation but was no dud. The critical charge: To persuade a FISA court to issue a warrant to spy on Trump aide Carter Page, the FBI relied on a dossier from a Trump-hating British spy using old Kremlin contacts while being paid to dig up dirt on Donald Trump by Hillary Clinton's campaign.

Not only were the Clinton campaign and Democratic National Committee paying Christopher Steele for his dirt-diving, the FBI put Steele on its payroll until they caught him lying about leaking to the media. In search-warrant requests, the FBI never told the FISA judge their primary source was Steele's 35-page dossier that FBI Director James Comey described as “salacious and unverified.”

From the Nunes memo, there was, at the highest level of the FBI, a cabal determined to derail Trump and elect Clinton. Heading it was Comey, who made the call to exonerate Clinton of criminal national-security charges, even before the FBI investigation concluded. Assisting was Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, running for a Virginia state senate seat, received $467,000 in contributions from Clinton bundler Terry McAuliffe.

Last week, McCabe was discharged from the FBI. In late September 2016, he learned his New York field office was sitting on emails between Anthony Weiner and his wife, Clinton aide Huma Abedin, which potentially contained security secrets. Not until late October did Comey inform Congress.

Peter Strzok, chief FBI investigator in the Clinton email server scandal and Russiagate, and his FBI girlfriend, Lisa Page, were ousted from the Mueller investigation when their anti-Trump bias and behavior were exposed last summer. And in 2016, the wife of Bruce Ohr, associate deputy attorney general under Loretta Lynch, was working for Fusion GPS, the oppo-research arm of the Clinton campaign, and he was in direct contact with Steele.

Virtually all of this went down before Robert Mueller was named special counsel. But the Russiagate investigation's poisoned roots and the investigators' hostility to Trump must cast a cloud of suspicion over whatever charges Mueller will bring. And if Mueller has given up trying to prove Trump collusion with the Kremlin and moved on to obstruction of justice, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein moves into the crosshairs. For the heart of any obstruction scenario is Trump's firing of Comey and his boasting about why he did it. Not only did Rosenstein discuss with Trump the firing of Comey, he produced the Department of Justice document to justify it. How can Rosenstein oversee Mueller's investigation into Comey's firing, which he was a witness to and a participant in?

If Americans are losing confidence in the FBI, whose fault is that? Is there not evidence that a hubristic cadre at the FBI's apex decided the republic must be saved from Trump and, should Clinton fail, they would step in? To the “deep state,” the American people's higher interests almost always coincide with their own.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon's White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me