ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Quotables: Divided opinions on Trump's parade proposal

| Sunday, Feb. 11, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron during the Bastille Day parade on the Champs Elysees avenue in Paris last July. (AP Photo | Carolyn Kaster)
President Donald Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron during the Bastille Day parade on the Champs Elysees avenue in Paris last July. (AP Photo | Carolyn Kaster)

Given the reactions to it, President Trump's order to the Pentagon to plan a military parade in Washington, D.C., is either a long-overdue shot in the arm for the armed services and veterans — or a garish, militaristic display that will waste money. Locally, at least, veterans saluted the idea. Elsewhere, Mr. Trump's proposal has been panned. The last such parades took place in Washington and New York in 1991 to commemorate the end of the Gulf War. Considerably more details are needed on the cost of Trump's proposal, how it will be paid and other considerations.

“It's a great idea. We've got to support the military and the veterans.”

Dwight Fuhrman

Pennsylvania commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars

“No one in the world doubts the strength of our military or the professionalism of our men and women in uniform. A parade will not alter that perception. Instead, it will likely prompt ridicule from our friends and foes alike.”

Ruben Gallego

A U.S. House representative from Arizona and a Marine veteran

“I'm all for it. I think we've grown complacent in the country. There's a growing disconnect between the population and military.”

Bob MacPherson

Retired Navy chief warrant officer from West Newton

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me