ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Paul Kengor: You fund 'Drag Queen Story Hour'

| Saturday, March 31, 2018, 8:31 p.m.
Pittsburgh Drag Queen Akasha Lestat Van-Cartier watches kids dance after reading to them during the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Monthly Drag Queen Story Hour at the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh-Allegheny Branch on the North Side on Saturday, Oct., 21, 2017.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Pittsburgh Drag Queen Akasha Lestat Van-Cartier watches kids dance after reading to them during the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Monthly Drag Queen Story Hour at the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh-Allegheny Branch on the North Side on Saturday, Oct., 21, 2017.

A recent viral video featured a New York City drag queen who, in full attire, sat before a group of children in a public library and read them stories.

“Who wants to be a drag queen when they grow up?” asked Lil' Miss Hot Mess , raising a hand, as several preschoolers reflexively lifted their hands in response.

Parents nationwide were aghast. Personally, I was shocked, but I basically figured: Well, there's not much I can do. At least it's not in my backyard.

That's not the case, as the Carnegie Library in Oakland on March 10 once again brought this spectacle to Pittsburgh, hosting “Drag Queen Story Hour,” the same name and brand displayed at that video's New York public library.

“Dance, sing and play during a fabulous event featuring a special guest!” raves the event's ad, giving time, location and other details on the Carnegie website , under a “Family Fun” tab and below a photo of a drag queen in front of very young children. “The story hour will celebrate diversity, promote self-acceptance and gender expression and honor each child as an individual. Dress up in your most fabulous attire and get ready to have fun! Recommended for children birth-grade 5 .”

Yes, those italics were in the ad. “Recommended” for kids — in “fabulous attire”— from infants to fifth grade. Conservatives are derided as paranoiacs for claiming the political-sexual left is targeting their children. Wouldn't this seem to support that fear?

I suspect some liberals will defend this by saying it's a voluntary event — you're not required to bring your children. Correct. But the funding isn't voluntary. This is a public library. Thus, you should at least have a say, because of the paramount reality that these are your tax dollars at work. Indeed, on the library website, under the ad promoting Drag Queen Story Hour, is the Allegheny Regional Asset District's “RAD Works Here” logo.

RAD's apparently at work at the Carnegie Library, which has received literally millions of RAD dollars over the years. It gets your money, directly. And if that money isn't enough, just above the RAD logo on the website (and under the drag-queen photo) is a plea for private donations: “Support the Library, give today.” There's also a “Donate, Advocate, and Volunteer” tab.

The library doesn't seem to lack private funders. There's a long list of corporate and other sponsors on the website, including Eat 'n Park, 84 Lumber, Hefren-Tillotson, UPMC, Highmark, Pittsburgh Penguins Foundation, Levin's, Rivers Casino, Waste Management, Pittsburgh Steelers, Chevron, PPG, PNC, BNY Mellon, Duquesne Light, Huntington and more.

All of which begs the question: Do these organizations and their boards, investors and employees support Drag Queen Story Hour? Do they mind their customers' money going to this? Do Eat 'n Park, 84 Lumber, the Penguins, the Steelers advocate this? Do they know what's going on?

I'd really like to know what Carnegie Library's funders think. And again, those funders include you, Mr. and Mrs. Taxpayer.

Paul Kengor is professor of political science and executive director of The Center for Vision & Values at Grove City College. His books include “A Pope and a President: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan and the Extraordinary Untold Story of the 20th Century.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me