ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Libertarians prod Republicans & Democrats

| Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Stories of government incompetence and overreach — from the disastrous rollout of the federal health care exchange to ongoing revelations about National Security Agency surveillance — have dominated the news.

It is telling that when the Cato Institute, the Washington libertarian think tank, held a seminar in Manhattan recently, it recorded its highest attendance. (Disclosure: I am an unpaid research associate with Cato.)

So a new survey on libertarianism by the Public Religion Research Institute, a nonpartisan group that studies religion, values and public life, couldn't come at a better time.

The survey pegged about 7 percent of Americans as fairly consistent libertarians prioritizing individual rights; another 15 percent are “libertarian leaners.”

Libertarians are an eclectic lot, united by a belief in freedom in economic, social and political realms. They want government out of people's business, whether it's having an abortion, owning a gun, smoking marijuana, running a company or emailing their friends. Politically, about half are either independents or supporters of a party outside the two-party system; most of the rest are Republicans. While they have some overlap with the tea party movement, the latter is much more religious and socially conservative.

Libertarianism is often stereotyped as overwhelmingly white and male. The survey finds some truth to that — but also more diversity than conventional wisdom holds. While 94 percent of libertarians are non-Hispanic whites, minorities make up about 20 percent of those leaning libertarian. And nearly a third of “true” libertarians and close to half of libertarian leaners are women.

Interestingly, libertarians are disproportionately young: One in four is under 30. This could make libertarianism the trend of the future, though some young people who prize autonomy above all might grow more community-minded and risk-averse as they age.

Americans' attitudes toward government are complex and often contradictory. Theoretically, the government is us — of the people, for the people — but it is also an institution that has legal power to coerce. In practice, we seem to want less government but more government services, less state power but more protection.

Even among self-identified libertarians, there is disagreement on the rightful scope of government. Although the Cato event included a scathing speech by institute vice president Gene Healy about National Security Agency spying, two Cato-affiliated scholars, Roger Pilon and Richard Epstein, have defended the surveillance as consistent with the state's proper role in national defense.

While virtually all libertarians oppose ObamaCare, their reform ideas range from radical laissez-faire in the health care market (which they believe would lower prices) to a more flexible, privatized version of universal insurance.

There is little chance of a libertarian agenda prevailing in America. But as a challenge to orthodoxies of left and right, libertarianism is a force for good. It might not always have the answers but it asks the right questions. We can debate how small government should be but the inauspicious start of health care reform reminds us that when government grows too big, it is likely to bite off more than it can chew.

Both traditionalist conservatives and (especially) progressive liberals are inclined to scorn libertarians as selfish seekers of unrestrained pleasures and/or profits. But without the libertarian alternative, both traditionalism and progressivism are always at risk of slipping into soft tyranny.

Cathy Young is a regular contributor to Reason magazine and

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me