ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

2013 was a year to remember (at least for a week or so)

| Monday, Dec. 30, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

“I liked it. All in all, a solid year.”

— Vladimir Putin

“Hated it. Terrible. Zero stars.”

— Barack Obama

“Someone told me that if I wanted my year I could keep my year, but now I'm being forced to switch to 2014. OBAMA'S AMERICA!”

— Health insurance subscriber

“2013 was good until I realized it wasn't 1863.”

— Paula Deen

From the same team that brought you 2012 (the year, not the movie), 2013 was a year filled with excitement. It had everything we've come to expect in a year, plus Miley Cyrus. The special effects were breathtaking — remember that meteor?

If the amount of coverage is anything to go on, the most important event of 2013 happened in November 1963.

A few other news stories managed to penetrate the thick fog of JFK-anniversary headlines. 2013 picked up right where 2012 left off, with the inauguration of President Obama to a second term. Beyoncé made news by not singing, which surprised people even though Britney Spears has built an entire musical career on not singing.

Dennis Rodman ran out of friends to play basketball with, so he went to North Korea and became pals with a terrifying dictator instead of joining a MeetUp group like the rest of us.

For a few awkward weeks, we all pretended we'd been paying attention to Syria for years. Fortunately we all stopped because some celebrity had a baby or something and babies are news, whereas there will always be plenty of humanitarian catastrophes to go around.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., used the nuclear option, transforming the Senate into a frozen wasteland full of radioactive spiders. This was a notable improvement on the way the Senate usually operates, and members were actually able to pass some stuff afterward. Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is trying to find out if there are any nuclear options he can use on the House.

In 2013, we learned that Edward Snowden likes airports so much that he was willing to leak top-secret information about the National Security Agency (NSA) to several newspapers in order to be able to spend more quality time in a terminal in Moscow. It turns out the NSA has been snooping in my emails and phone records.

The federal government shut down but then started back up with a new operating system that didn't work, either.

Chris Christie won the 2013 GOP primary that is imaginary and run by pundits. Unfortunately, the actual primary is not until 2016, and it is run by real, live Republican voters.

Netflix released some original series, one of which starred Kevin Spacey as a Machiavellian figure laboring under the mistaken impression that Congress is supposed to accomplish things. You could tell that the show was deeply accurate because it included a newspaper reporter being discouraged from tweeting and blogging.

George W. Bush's paintings revealed that he should not have quit his day job. (Actually, at the time of writing, the paintings had gotten us into zero wars, so, never mind.)

There were some hairy moments. We all remember that point in August after the MTV Video Music Awards, when we worried that national reserves of indignation had been depleted through careless overuse of adverbs. Or how the year's early efforts to explore themes of race in a thoughtful way had disintegrated, by October, into Julianne Hough's Halloween costume.

But all in all, I would recommend this year, with some reservations. For instance, the news relied too heavily on anniversaries. Also, isn't it a bit early to start the Hillary 2016 speculation? Did we really need so many babies? And there seemed to be some redundancy with the theme of government dysfunction, which was explored sufficiently from 420 B.C. to A.D. 1992 and from 2000 to present, with pauses for the Clinton era and Visigoth invasions. This has been played out, and for 2014 it would be great to see more exploration of such themes as peace, prosperity and functionality, all historically underrepresented.

Still, a solid year. Three stars.

Alexandra Petri writes the ComPost blog at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me