ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary


| Saturday, Jan. 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

“In a few days, the Geneva agreement will be implemented. Do you know what the Geneva agreement is? It means the superpowers' surrender to the great Iranian nation.”

— Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, on approval of an interim agreement, effective this Monday, that eases some economic sanctions on Iran in return for supposed and dubious limits on its nuclear development program.

“We may have lost interest in the Middle East, but the Middle East has not lost interest in us.”

— Thomas Donnelly, scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, and Mary Habeck, noted Mideast author, writing in The Weekly Standard on how President Obama misunderstands the region.

“(T)o borrow Dick Cheney's phrase about the Clintonistas in 2000, it's time for (John McCain) to go. ... (M)ust McCain go on torturing the Republican Party?”

— Steven Hayward, writing at

“(F)or governments that are serious about bringing their spending in line with revenues, privatization is a useful tool. It allows governments to cut their debts and improve their credit ratings, thus reducing their outgoings, and it improves the economy's efficiency by boosting competition and by applying private-sector capital and skills to newly privatized assets.”

— from an editorial in The Economist, urging a new wave of privatization centered on selling government-owned property.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me