ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

ObamaCare's lackadaisical layabouts

| Sunday, May 18, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

When ObamaCare operatives aren't busy trashing the private health insurance market and squandering billions on useless technology, they're busy ... being idle. File the latest example of government health care profligacy under “Caution: Your tax dollars not at work.”

According to at least one ObamaCare paper-pusher, employees at an application-processing center in Wentzville, Mo., are getting paid to sit around and do nothing. Investigative reporter Chris Nagus of the St. Louis television station KMOV News 4 spoke to the whistle-blower. “They want to hire more people even though we still don't have work to keep the people that we have busy,” the worker revealed. “There are some weeks that a data-entry person would not process an application.”

The worker also spilled the beans on how his colleagues are “told to sit at their computers and hit the refresh button every 10 minutes.” Another former worker at the processing facility added that the company “is a JOKE! There is nothing to do — NO WORK.”

You will not be surprised to learn that the company in charge of these ObamaCare layabouts is embroiled in scandal.

Multinational tech-management company Serco Inc. won a $1.2 billion contract with the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services last summer to “support” the beleaguered ObamaCare health care exchanges. (According to the latest estimates, nearly half a billion dollars in taxpayer subsidies have been squandered on inoperable or defunct health care exchanges in Massachusetts, Oregon, Nevada and Maryland.) In addition to the office in Missouri, Serco oversees ObamaCare processing centers in Rogers, Ark., Lawton, Okla., and London, Ky., which are projected to “employ” up to 10,000 people.

Not long after Serco snagged its contract, news broke in Britain of a massive probe of fraud involving Serco's parent company. The firm allegedly overbilled the government by “tens of millions of pounds” on a public contract to electronically monitor parolees. Investigators found that Serco had billed British taxpayers for tracking criminals who were dead or still in prison.

And in Australia, Serco has been investigated and fined $15 million for mismanaging asylum detention centers across the country, where more than a dozen detainees have escaped and riots and chaos reigned.

The see-no-incompetence Obama administration, for its part, has no worries, as usual. “Serco is a highly skilled company that has a proven track record in providing cost-effective services to numerous other federal agencies,” Medicare spokesman Brian Cook said in response to questions last year about Serco's integrity. Serco's American subsidiary is one of the largest federal prime contractors in the U.S., with oversight of our patent-application and visa-application processing systems as well. Egad!

Serco is just the latest in a parade of shady federal health care contractors — from fraud-riddled Seedco to feckless CGI Federal —that are ripping off American taxpayers. While the White House amuses itself with selfies and hashtags, the ObamaCare clunker keeps burning up our billions to pay do-nothings. It's the slush fund from hell.

Michelle Malkin is the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” (Regnery 2009).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me