Suppressing free (climate) speech
I receive loads of mail in response to my nationally syndicated column. Some recent mail has been quite disturbing. Here's a sample:
“Given your support of freedom on a great many issues, I wish to bring to your attention the following George Mason University staff who have formally called on the president to use RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) statutes to punish organizations and individuals who dispute the ‘consensus' of the” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The writer goes on to say, “I am appalled that anyone associated with George Mason would so misuse the power of the federal government.”
This letter writer's problem, like that of many others, is a misperception of George Mason University, where I am an economics professor. We have a distinguished economics department that can boast of having had two homegrown Nobel Prize winners on our faculty. Plus, we have a worldwide reputation as a free-market economics department.
With this kind of intellectual firepower at George Mason University, most people assume that it is like its namesake, a libertarian or free-market university. Little could be further from the truth. My university, at which I've toiled for 35 years, has a political makeup like that of most other universities — middle of the road to liberal/progressive.
I investigated this call for the use of RICO. It turns out that Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., has called for the criminal investigation of people and organizations that are seen as global-warming deniers. This would include lawsuits against the coal and oil industries, certain think tanks and other organizations that question the global-warming religion.
By the way, so that Whitehouse and his gang don't appear silly, they've changed their concern from global warming to climate change. That's stupid in and of itself, for when has the climate not been changing, even before mankind arrived?
It turns out that George Mason University meteorologist Jagadish Shukla is the lead signatory of the letter sent to the president and attorney general asking them to use RICO laws to prosecute “corporations and other organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change.” This GMU professor has been recently revealed as a “climate profiteer.” From 2012 to 2014, this leader of the climate scientists paid himself and his wife $1.5 million from government climate grants for part-time work (http://tinyurl.com/p2c8nx3).
The effort to suppress global-warming dissidents is not new. Grist Magazine writer David Roberts said, “When we've finally gotten serious about global warming, when the impacts are really hitting us and we're in a full worldwide scramble to minimize the damage, we should have war crimes trials for these (expletive) — some sort of climate Nuremberg.”
The global-warming agenda is a desperate effort to gain greater control over our lives. Political commentator Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956) explained that “the whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” That's the political goal of the global warmers.
Walter Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.