ShareThis Page
Featured Commentary

Unceasing beatings and arrests in Cuba

| Saturday, Oct. 10, 2015, 11:54 p.m.

Two reports put the human-rights problem in Cuba into stark, and discouraging, relief. In the period since the landmark agreement in December re-establishing full diplomatic relations with the United States, the Castro government appears to be doubling down on repression.

One report, delivered at the General Assembly of the Inter American Press Association, contains a depressing overview of press freedom in the Americas. No country is safe from the wave of censorship sweeping the region, the report says. Yet Cuba is a special case:

“In Cuba, despite the re-establishment of relations between the Cuban and U.S. governments, little progress has been made in freedom of expression, freedom of association and freedom of the press, and two journalists remain behind bars. The methods of repression include censorship of critical websites, inspection of emails, suspension of mobile phone service and physical and verbal attacks on activists and independent journalists.”

In other words, nothing has changed: Expressing an independent opinion in Cuba is hazardous to your civil liberties.

The independent Commission on Human Rights and National Reconciliation put it into numbers: The Havana group said it recorded 882 political detentions in September, the most in the past 15 months.

And, according to the commission, being a dissident is hazardous to your health, as well.

It accused government agents or their surrogates of carrying out 93 beatings on political dissidents during the past month, an “abrupt” escalation over the 21 registered in August.

What's even more outrageous, if such is possible: The commission said the government unleashed “a genuine wave of political and social repression that led to at least 353 ‘preventive detentions' ” during the visit of Pope Francis and in the days leading up to it, with the aim of keeping dissidents from attending any gathering with the pontiff.

Keep in mind that all of this is taking place within the context of a “normalization” of relations with the United States based on the presumption of concessions by both sides. For the United States, as President Obama made clear in his declaration last December, improvement in the human-rights climate on the island is one of the principal objectives of U.S. diplomacy. Yet so far, Cuba couldn't seem to care less about its obligation to treat its citizens with respect.

It's up to Congress to decide whether or not to end the trade embargo against Cuba. But at this point, dropping the embargo would be premature.

No one realistically expected an overnight improvement in the climate of democracy in Cuba as a result of the normalization of diplomatic relations with the United States.

But until the government takes concrete actions to lift the stifling repression and allows Cubans to speak without fear of retaliation, Congress shouldn't budge.

— adapted from a Miami Herald editorial.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me