Frank Dermody: Republican ‘dirty dozen’ threaten public safety |
Featured Commentary

Frank Dermody: Republican ‘dirty dozen’ threaten public safety


Imagine a world where you could commit any crime — even killing another person — but as long as you were the one who called the police and reported yourself, you’d walk away scot-free.

That’s the world some corporate special interests are asking extremist Republicans to build for them — a regulatory Wild West where profits come before public safety and state regulators are told to stand down.

We’ve seen too often what happens when corporations police themselves. The Upper Big Branch Mine disaster. The Volkswagen diesel emissions cheating scandal. The willful misrepresentation by drugmakers about opioid drug safety. The Boeing 737 Max.

Although most corporations prioritize public safety and long-term success, it only takes one bad actor to cut the wrong corner in the name of quick profits to cause a tragedy.

Despite the danger, some Republican lawmakers in Harrisburg are pushing their very own “Dirty Dozen” — five bills containing 12 proposals to let corporate special interests have almost anything they want even when public safety is put at risk.

These bills would do things like:

• Let corporations escape penalties when their negligence leads to permanent harm or even death if the corporation is the one reporting the accident to the state.

• Put the burden of accidents and pollution cleanup solely on the taxpayers and let the corporation off the hook.

• Allow politicians in the Legislature to eliminate any regulation at any time regardless of the impact on public safety.

• Let a corporation use third-party inspectors to approve a permit application if a state agency cannot approve it by an arbitrary deadline — and the same corporation could try to delay things in order to run out the clock.

• Offer corporations a defense for broken rules by simply saying they didn’t understand the rules. (Try that the next time you get pulled over for speeding.)

• Require a repetitive second vote in the Republican-controlled Legislature to adopt a new regulation when combined annual compliance costs exceed very low thresholds.

• Create a “Repealer General” appointed by the Republican majority to decide what state rules and regulations should be eliminated when corporations ask.

Despite what the Republican sponsors of these bills want you to believe, this isn’t about cutting red tape or taking away obsolete regulations. It’s about preventing state agencies from doing their job to guard the health and safety of all people.

This isn’t just about clean air and water. It’s about everything from safe workspaces to farm and food safety, consumer protection and even ending child labor.

House Democrats are fighting to adequately fund oversight agencies like the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Labor & Industry. But since 2010, Republican lawmakers in Pennsylvania have consistently voted to starve our crucial safety agencies of basic resources.

These new proposals — the Dirty Dozen — take this tactic to a chilling new low — handing the fox the keys to the henhouse and inevitably putting Pennsylvania taxpayers on the hook to clean up the mess.

What can you do? Contact your state lawmakers and let them know that putting people at risk to go easy on corporate special interests is never acceptable. There’s still time for people like you to be heard and to stop these dangerous games.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.