Greg Christy: Can the power region afford to miss the shale revolution boat? |
Featured Commentary

Greg Christy: Can the power region afford to miss the shale revolution boat?

A drilling rig is used to extract natural gas from the Marcellus shale near Houston in Washington County.

We are in the middle of a great American shale revolution. For the first time in decades, the United States is holding its own against OPEC and Russia, going from energy importer to energy exporter. Unlocking previously inaccessible shale reservoirs deep underground using hydraulic fracturing technology is becoming our nation’s ticket to energy dominance.

The impact of shale development has now propelled America to become the top producer of oil and natural gas in the world, with a huge supply of natural gas liquids to fuel manufacturing growth. Two decades ago, our nation was staring down a potential energy crisis, but a world energy leader emerged.

The shale revolution is entering a new stage of maturity, and we must be prepared.

Much-needed energy infrastructure is coming to the mid-Atlantic region, but more pipelines are needed. A multitude of petrochemical companies are moving to the “power region” — Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia — to capitalize on access to markets and abundant supply of valuable natural gas liquids. One large ethane cracker plant is already under construction by Shell in Monaca, and another one is on the verge of being approved in Shadyside, Ohio. There’s a possibility that two more could be on the horizon. These mega projects have the potential to create new industry clusters, something we haven’t seen in generations.

In addition to infrastructure, another critical need to support this new stage of shale development is skilled labor. With a wave of baby-boomer retirements, workers who switched careers during the recession and a younger generation that is not considering construction as a viable career option, contractors and end users are reporting a skilled labor shortage. Such a shortage could lead to higher prices and longer construction schedules. In fact, three out of four construction firms are showing concern about finding hourly craftworkers over the next year. But is there such a desperate lack of skilled labor or is the panic due to a disconnect somewhere between supply and demand?

Regardless of contractors’ concerns about a lack of skilled labor, the building trades have always maintained a healthy supply of job-ready, skilled, safe workers. The building trades prepare safe and skilled workers through training, earn-while-you-learn apprenticeship programs, innovative measures to improve diversity and worker retention, and fair wages. They invest in comprehensive training, including in-depth safety training, saving time and money for contractors and end users. A safe workforce reduces injuries, fatalities and costly delays, adding up to huge cost savings. For example, the Iron Workers (IW) training centers collectively invest between $80 million and $90 million a year in apprenticeship and journeyman upgrade training and the apprenticeship program averages 3,000 to 6,000 graduates a year.

The trades cannot do it alone. To sustain a healthy supply of skilled labor, we need support from the Department of Labor (DOL) and the Trump administration. President Trump announced plans to make expansion of apprenticeship programs the center of his labor policy. We need the administration to keep that promise to fund apprenticeship programs, as they are the “bread and butter” of a plentiful and skilled workforce.

One of the biggest reasons for the construction industry’s skilled labor vacuum that resulted from baby boomers exiting the workforce is the lack of awareness and a plan to build a pipeline of workers. We need to stop telling our young people that their only path to success is a four-year college degree.

Nontraditional career paths often are not presented as viable and lucrative alternatives to college for young people graduating from high school. According to the DOL, 87 percent of apprentices are employed after completing their programs, with an average starting wage above $50,000. Earn-while-you-learn apprenticeship programs in the trades allow high school graduates to make a decent living while being trained for a lifelong career, as opposed to accruing college debt for four years with no promise of a career afterwards.

We simply need to do better at promoting vocational and technical training at the middle and high school levels and provide young people with choices and information so that they can find lucrative and satisfying careers. We need to change the narrative about careers in the skilled trades.

We need to retool the existing workforce. We also need more leaders like Gov. Tom Wolf who last month reaffirmed his commitment to invest in the Pennsylvania workforce.

The clock is ticking to handle this impending tsunami of workforce demand. We must be prepared to meet the demand to keep the momentum going toward U.S. energy dominance.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.