Jason Wilburn: USMCA is 21st-century enhancement America needs | TribLIVE.com
Featured Commentary

Jason Wilburn: USMCA is 21st-century enhancement America needs


Just like the unseen parts used to make automobiles and airplanes work, the contributions of the Keystone State are often experienced — even if not always seen — every day around the world. The products manufactured in Pennsylvania help make the world function, but all of that could slow down if a critical trade agreement with our North American neighbors is not approved by Congress.

This is why, as president of Foerster Instruments, a manufacturer of equipment for the nondestructive testing of materials and components, I joined manufacturers from around the country in Washington last week to tell lawmakers how important it is to support and ratify the United States-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.

According to the National Association of Manufacturers, more than 40,000 manufacturing jobs in Pennsylvania depend on manufacturing exports to Canada and Mexico. Of the more than 3,000 Pennsylvania manufacturers that export products to Canada and Mexico, 80% of them are small- and medium-sized companies. Pennsylvania’s small- and medium sized businesses benefit in many ways from the tariff-free trade made possible by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and that’s true in different sectors of our economy.

Consider, for instance, that small- and medium-sized businesses make up nearly three-quarters of the state’s exports of chemical and electrical equipment to Canada and Mexico — and that Pennsylvania’s chemical and electrical equipment exports to Canada and Mexico have increased by more than 60% over the last decade under the current NAFTA framework.

But NAFTA is now more than 25 years old and in need of an update. That’s why the leaders of the U.S., Canada and Mexico negotiated a new and modern agreement to replace it. Soon it will be submitted to Congress for a vote. That new agreement is the USMCA, and companies like mine are counting on Congress to pass it.

I had the opportunity to meet with top lawmakers and explain the importance of tariff-free trade to my business and how the USMCA would build on previous trade deals and provide less onerous requirements to ship manufactured goods to our North American neighbors. I let them know how many of the products we make are shipped to customers in Canada and Mexico.

I also explained that, without tariff-free trade across North America protected by a strong trade agreement, our state’s manufactured exports to Canada and Mexico could be hit with as much as $1.7 billion in extra taxes. Costs like that are enough to devastate any business. As a result, many of Pennsylvania’s manufacturers and the workers and communities they support would lose sales as competitors from Europe and Asia swoop in on our missed opportunity, steal our business and, along with it, the American dream. We can’t let that happen.

We need to cut the red tape and the arduous regulations that make it harder to do business. The USMCA does this for small manufacturers. If the USMCA is ratified, businesses like mine will be able to continue doing what we do best: create highly sophisticated components and provide constant innovations in products to our global customers. That’s good for Pennsylvania and it’s good for our country.

I hope you will join me in urging our lawmakers to support this vital agreement and ratify it when it comes to a vote this year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.