Jeff Dunetz: Restrict immigration to soften blow of automation |
Featured Commentary

Jeff Dunetz: Restrict immigration to soften blow of automation


Automation and artificial intelligence could make 54 million Americans’ jobs obsolete within the next decade, according to McKinsey & Company.

Lesser-skilled jobs in manufacturing, construction and service industries will be the first to go. Increasingly, robots can perform these jobs more efficiently than humans. Robots also don’t need costly benefits like health care or paid time off. And they never strike or show up late.

Most forecasters anticipate that automation will displace tens of millions of unskilled and semi-skilled workers. Fortunately there is a way to soften the blow. Reducing both illegal and legal immigration would shrink the lower-skilled labor market, thereby alleviating some of the crushing pressure on America’s working class.

For many Americans with college degrees, the labor market is steadily improving. But for those who lack high school diplomas, the job market remains bleak. For these individuals, the official unemployment rate is 5.4% — more than double that of college-educated Americans. Their wages stagnated from 2007 to 2017, even as living costs increased.

Unable to secure gainful employment, many of these workers have abandoned their job searches altogether. Less than half of high school dropouts 25 and older participate in the labor force.

Life will only get harder for these disadvantaged Americans. Nearly half of all U.S. businesses have embraced advanced robotics and artificial intelligence within the past five years.

It’s no surprise why firms are adopting these technologies. AI technologies can eliminate human error, execute tasks far faster, and generate substantial cost savings.

Consider how automation and AI are poised to upend the lives of America’s 3.5 million truckers. Trials for semi-automated trucks are proving successful. A number of companies — including Volvo Trucks and Peleton Technology — are creating platooning systems, which allow digitally connected trucks to travel together in a convoy. Experts predict that only one driver will be needed per convoy eventually — thus drastically reducing the demand for truckers.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Fastbrick Robotics recently designed a robot that lays 1,000 bricks per hour. Lowe’s introduced a robot in its stores that assists with inventory and provides basic customer service and troubleshooting. And Miso Robotics created a robot cook that prepares burgers from scratch.

These technological advances — and a slew of others currently in development — will slash demand for low-skilled laborers.

Current immigration policies will only make this wave of automation more difficult for workers. The federal government hands out about 1 million lifetime work and residency permits to legal immigrants each year. These folks are overwhelmingly decent and hardworking — but most of them have limited skills and educations. Many barely speak English. Illegal immigration and guest worker programs add another 1 million or so workers to the U.S. population each year.

It makes no sense to continue importing millions of low-skilled workers when automation is wiping out many low-skilled jobs. Oversaturating the labor market merely drives down Americans’ wages. For every 10% increase in the size of the low-skilled labor market, wages for U.S. workers in that skill-group drop by roughly 3%, according to Harvard economist George Borjas.

Thankfully, some in Washington recognize this dilemma.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, for instance, recently proposed a bill that would require all employers to use E-Verify — a free, online system that checks whether newly hired laborers are legally eligible to work.

By making it extremely difficult for illegal immigrants to find work, the system humanely deters them from coming to the United States in the first place. In states that have mandated E-Verify, the illegal immigrant population has fallen by 50% or more, according to an IZA Journal of Migration study by economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas and Agnes Scott College.

Sens. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and David Perdue, R-Ga., recently reintroduced the Raise Act, a bill that would trim legal immigration by roughly half. President Trump endorsed the legislation in the last session of Congress.

Automation is poised to transform America’s economy. Many affluent consumers will benefit from these changes, which will make goods and services even cheaper. But many less-skilled workers will suffer, as the only jobs they’ve known disappear.

It’s time for lawmakers to acknowledge these workers’ plight — and curb the influx of low-skilled foreigners who inadvertently make life harder for less-skilled Americans.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.