Jennifer Elliott: Pennsylvania school screenings missing vital asthma test |
Featured Commentary

Jennifer Elliott: Pennsylvania school screenings missing vital asthma test


With students back in class, schools across the state are providing annual vision and hearing screenings to help ensure student well-being. Unfortunately, Pennsylvania does not mandate a screening for the most common chronic childhood disease: asthma.

Such screenings should be required in Pennsylvania, which has the second highest percentage of children suffering from asthma in the United States, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. A 2017 Allegheny Health Network study found that of more than 1,200 Western Pennsylvania school children, 24% suffered from asthma, as compared to the national average of 8.3% as reported by the National Center for Health Statistics.

In my work in the Pittsburgh region, I’ve screened thousands of students for asthma and personally seen how the disease affects parents and their children. The impact on their lives is significant.

Asthma is one of the top reasons for missed school days, causing students to not only fall behind in their classes but also miss opportunities to socially interact with peers, take on an active lifestyle or participate in sports. Without treatment, these children face an uphill battle to keep up.

The situation is direr for people living in underserved communities, where access to health services can be spotty or nonexistent. Some groups of children, specifically African American children and those on public insurance, have a significantly higher prevalence of the disease and poorer disease control.

In many cases, parents aren’t aware that their child is suffering from asthma. In previous studies, we’ve found that approximately 15% of parents may not even know that their children have the disease. This in turn leads to trouble sleeping at night, limited activity, missed school days and unnecessary emergency room visits.

It’s a problem that’s not going away, given the number of Pennsylvania cities that suffer from poor air quality. Studies have shown that air pollution, among other triggers, can worsen asthma symptoms, and Pennsylvania locations scored poorly on the American Lung Association’s 2019 State of the Air report. Pittsburgh and Johnstown- Somerset were among the Pennsylvania regions listed in the report’s top 25 for most polluted areas by “year-round particulate pollution.”

Just like vision and hearing screenings, state-mandated asthma screenings would help to identify problems early and ultimately improve student health and educational outcomes. Schools that have integrated asthma screenings as part of their back-to-school physicals are seeing excellent results.

Last year, more than 1,000 children from several school districts received asthma screenings as part of their back-to-school process. Children with undiagnosed or uncontrolled asthma were connected to care. Thanks to that success, six school districts will be teaming up with Duquesne University’s School of Pharmacy to conduct asthma screenings in their districts.

At these screenings, parents simply complete a four-question survey that helps identify if their child has asthma and if so, if it was controlled by medication. The school location ensures that all children, even those without convenient access to health care, can be screened and identified early.

By mandating school-based asthma screenings, we can improve the health of our children and establish a foundation for students to excel in school and in life.

Jennifer Elliott, Pharm.D., is an associate professor of pharmacy at Duquesne University, Pittsburgh.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.