ShareThis Page
Joseph Sabino Mistick

Joseph Sabino Mistick: Trump's tweets seduce media, eclipse other news

| Saturday, Jan. 6, 2018, 9:00 p.m.
Supporters of Pakistani religious groups rally to condemn a tweet by President Donald Trump in Karachi, Pakistan on Jan. 2. Trump slammed Pakistan for 'lies & deceit' in a New Year's Day tweet that said Islamabad had played U.S. leaders for 'fools.' 'No more,' Trump tweeted. (AP Photo | Fareed Khan)
Supporters of Pakistani religious groups rally to condemn a tweet by President Donald Trump in Karachi, Pakistan on Jan. 2. Trump slammed Pakistan for 'lies & deceit' in a New Year's Day tweet that said Islamabad had played U.S. leaders for 'fools.' 'No more,' Trump tweeted. (AP Photo | Fareed Khan)

After North Korean leader Kim Jung Un claimed “the entire United States is within range of our nuclear weapons, and a nuclear button is always on my desk,” no one could have been surprised at Donald Trump's response.

“I too have a Nuclear Button, but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my Button works!” he tweeted. That's just Trump, and his supporters love this stuff. He stands in for them, using words they wish they had used when faced with some past personal slight. And it works politically because those schoolyard responses are shiny objects, dominating the headlines. There may be far more important issues, but the media are willingly seduced by Trump's latest tweet.

Leading up to Republican passage of so-called tax reform, Trump repeatedly claimed he would not personally benefit. Hours after the bill's passage, Trump told his rich pals at Mar-a-Lago, “You all just got a lot richer,” according to CBS News. And Forbes reported that just one rule change will save Trump $11 million a year. In pre-Trump times, this would have caused collective outrage, but now it gets lost in the maelstrom of the things he says in the wake of events.

Starting on Christmas Eve, a flurry of Trump tweets attacked FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, James Comey and Hillary Clinton. He even called for jailing Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Later, he launched Twitter attacks on Pakistan and the Iranian government. And then he tweeted a threat to cut off aid to the Palestinians for not showing appreciation or respect.

For his sake, the more outrageous his tweets are, the better. If they captivate the press and public, far more important Trump administration actions slide by without fanfare. And as reported by The Washington Post's James Hohmann in The Daily 202, this holiday break saw a lot of big changes announced in news dumps, easily eclipsed by Trump's tweets.

At 2017's end, the Interior Department rescinded an Obama-era fracking regulation that “would have tightened standards for well construction and wastewater management” and “required the disclosure of the chemicals contained in fracking fluids.” Just before New Year's Eve, the administration granted oil companies' request to weaken rules designed to prevent another Deepwater Horizon oil spill, including worker safety provisions. A week earlier, protections for migratory birds fell to the Big Energy interests, a win for the Koch brothers and billionaire Trump energy adviser Howard Hamm. Northern Minnesota's Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness had a bright future until Interior decided, just before Christmas, to renew expired leases for copper and nickel mining operations.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ended 2017 with a critical shortage of managers, hobbling its ability to ensure worker safety. And the already small Chemical Safety Board, charged with investigating major chemical accidents, prepared to shut down, unfunded.

So, the next time Trump bombards us with outrageous tweets, ask yourself this: What else is going on that he doesn't want us to know about?

Joseph Sabino Mistick is a Pittsburgh lawyer (joemistick.com).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me