Letter to the editor: 100% renewable energy is possible | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: 100% renewable energy is possible

My dad saved everything. When it came time to go through decades worth of what he’d collected, I held onto buttons of sentimental value, including some from World War II that read “Remember Pearl Harbor” and “Play Safe with Freedom.” Another button, “Join the Fight for Clean Water,” circa 1974, sparked childhood memories of growing up in Sutersville along the Yough River when it flowed with orange water from acid mine drainage and pollution from Mon Valley steel mills. These industries made their money and left, leaving residents to clean up.

While we’ve come a long way in cleaning up pollution, the fight for clean air and water continues to this day. The Sierra Club’s Ready for 100 Campaign, which recently launched in Westmoreland County, is fighting for a cleaner, healthier way to supply our country’s energy needs. Through a just transition process, 100% clean, renewable energy community-wide is possible.

Reaching this goal won’t happen overnight, but we must put in the work now. We are calling on community leaders to work with our team; to plan for the future, work toward long-term goals and to do what is best for future generations.

“A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they will not sit under” (Chinese proverb).

Terrie Balko

Sewickley Township, Westmoreland County

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.