Letter to the editor: Addressing Highlands administration issues | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Addressing Highlands administration issues

The Highlands School District administration continues stonewalling residents with recent comment policy change, and only relented to newspaper inquiries when faced with legal sanctions for violation of the Pennsylvania Sunshine Act (“Highlands comment policy causes confusion, raises concerns,” May 23, TribLIVE). 

Homeowners may exercise civil disobedience by withholding school tax payments to protest lack of transparency.

Tarentum retiree Joe Pavlik proposed placing tax funds in escrow to be released quarterly contingent upon satisfactory school administration performance.

Residents can affect the following outcomes, effectively relieving the administration and school board of authority:

• Create a budget crisis, mandating Pennsylvania Department of Education intervention.

• Force Pennsylvania auditor general oversight of district operations.

Our initial request is rescinding the “comment policy” and discussing meeting agendas per line item, allowing time for attendee feedback. We also request mandatory school board meeting attendance by a minimum of five members, with no single member absence permitted for two consecutive meetings.

Our administrators would be wise to solicit advice from Pavlik and other residents with budgeting and fiscal experience. They welcome the opportunity to contribute.

David Poskin


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.