Letter to the editor: America’s addiction to fossil fuels | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: America’s addiction to fossil fuels

We’vebeen reading about, and perhaps experiencing, the death and destruction being caused by the opioid crisis. But there is another, more widespread addiction crisis in this country that has the potential to affect every citizen (“Americans’ energy use surges despite climate change concern,” April 21, TribLIVE). In spite of growing evidence that global warming is having devastating effects on our economy and the public health, we keep consuming more fossil fuels with their harmful emissions. 

For the sake of future generations, this cannot continue. We must find ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions before it’s too late. Private industry is working hard to switch to clean renewable energy sources. And there are concerted efforts by local, county and state governments to curb emissions. But we cannot do what must be done without our federal government taking the lead.

The good news is that the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act has been introduced in the House and has 32 co-sponsors, with more joining almost daily. It will place a fee on carbon emissions at the source (mine, well, port of entry) and return the proceeds to all Americans as a monthly dividend. The dividend will more than offset the increase in price of fossil-fuel-based products for most people.

Please take the time to learn about the legislation at www.energyinnovationact.org and tell your member of the House and Senators to quickly pass the bill. Your kids and grandkids will thank you.

Bruce Cooper

Adams


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.