Letter to the editor: Apollo needs its police | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Apollo needs its police

Apollo’s council raised taxes for the first time in over a decade (“Apollo tax hike approved, office hours cut until manager hired,” Dec. 18, TribLIVE). Although a bitter pill to swallow, it was overdue to keep up with inflation. The additional tax money will go into the general fund for use as budgeted. 

We need to be concerned that this tax increase be applied toward sustaining and growing our police department rather than contracting outside police services, including the Pennsylvania State Police or forming a regional department. Either of these options severely limits the council’s and mayor’s ability to manage daily police operations and will result in extended response times to volatile incidents within the borough. When violent situations evolve, lives are at stake and require rapid response by the borough’s police first and then backup from area departments for the safety of the immediate community.

Unfortunately, history has taught us that Apollo is not immune to violence. The death of Officer Leonard Miller, the recent officer-involved shooting and drive-by shootings, and the murder-suicides that have occurred over the years are more than enough examples to warrant Apollo’s council to continue budgeting for its own police force.

Please speak up to council in support of your tax dollars funding Apollo’s police department.

Jeff Held


The writer is former mayor of Apollo.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.