ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Assist in rehabilitation | TribLIVE.com
Letters to the Editor

Letter to the editor: Assist in rehabilitation

Having lived on both sides of our criminal justice system, through my own incarceration to now assisting re-entrants back into society as the founder of Breaking the Chainz Inc., I’ve seen multiple stumbling blocks to success: access to safe housing, family reunification, job readiness, substance abuse treatment, anger management, financial literacy, conflict resolution and decision-making skills among them. Without support, returning citizens are 13 percent more likely to be rearrested, and 21 percent more likely to return to prison, according to the National Justice Bureau.

Senate Bill 14, introduced by State Sens. Anthony Williams, a Philadelphia Democrat, and Camera Bartolotta, a Western Pennsylvania Republican, is a first step toward a more just system. Through rational responses to technical violations, incentivizing good behavior and ensuring that probationers have access to the services they need to be successful, the co-sponsors of this legislation recognize the importance of community supervision that rehabilitates offenders.

While there is no easy fix to this sweltering problem, there is broad support for reforms that will support those individuals who both want and need assistance as they strive for change. We should continue to push for reforms that move our communities away from incarceration and toward rehabilitation.

Dr. Kevin Dolphin

Harrisburg

The writer is founder of Breaking the Chainz Inc., a community-prison outreach program.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.